Features
Topics
Discover

Unlock the potential of your career in the Pharma industry with our online courses and qualifications.

Career Path

Pick a career path, follow its guided course roadmap, and secure industry-verified credentials in a few months.

Courses

Earn career credentials from industry leaders that demonstrate your expertise.

Train Validation Test in Lab: What You Must Know

Lab-based modeling and data analysis have become essential for pharmaceutical QA/QC professionals. Yet many still confuse key terms like “train,” “validation,” and “test” — especially when applying machine learning to method development or analytical validation. This confusion can lead to inaccurate results, poor model performance, and regulatory non-compliance.

In this article, we answer the most-asked questions around the train validation test process in labs. You’ll learn definitions, procedures, goals, and how to apply these concepts correctly to protect data integrity.

Understand how data flows in a proper train-validation-test split.
Build reliable models by splitting your lab data correctly.

What Does the Train Validation Test Process Mean?

Many lab professionals ask: “What does the train validation test process mean in a lab setting?”

Let’s start with basics. A dataset is usually divided into three parts:

  • Training set: builds the model
  • Validation set: tunes the model

Test set: assesses final performance

 

In lab environments, this can apply to chemometric models, digital twins, or predictive tools like stability trend analysis. You must ensure the validation dataset isn’t used during training. Similarly, you must keep your test dataset untouched until model development ends.
This strategy is essential for analytical method validation and model reproducibility. Without a proper train test split, your results become biased, fail audits, or underperform in production.

Sign up for Performing Phase of GMP Equipment Qualification Course

Discover more about this course by signing up

5 Reasons to Split Your Data Correctly

Splitting data incorrectly leads to serious issues. Here’s why good practice matters:

Ensures reliable model evaluation

Using the test dataset only once helps avoid inflated results.

Prevents overfitting

Train validation test processes catch early signs of overfitting.

Meets regulatory expectations

GxP labs must separate training and testing for data integrity.

Supports reproducibility

Independent test data validates real-world performance.

Aligns with AI and ML standards

All ML train test frameworks require strict data split procedures.

What Are the Main Objectives of the Train Validation Test Process?

Ensure Model Reliability

First, models must generalize — not memorize. The train validation test framework ensures that. It uses known inputs (training), adjusts tuning (validation), and finally tests the outcome (test). Each step acts as a safeguard against failure.

Align With Regulatory Science

Secondly, the process satisfies data integrity rules like ALCOA+. Regulators expect models to be repeatable, reliable, and separate from biased training data. Without this structure, any model used in method validation becomes non-compliant.

Want to improve your validation procedures?

Enroll in the Laboratory Method Validation – Foundational Course today.

Understand the full train validation test process used in lab environments.
Lab models perform best with a clear train validation test strategy.

How to Split Train Validation Test Sets: 7 Key Rules

Split before training begins

Lock the test set before writing model code.

Use random and stratified sampling

Keep variable distributions consistent across splits.

Follow time-based splits for trends

In time-series data, split chronologically, not randomly.

Keep test set small but untouched

Use 10–20% of the data for final testing.

Use cross-validation to improve performance

Replace a static validation set with rotating folds.

What Is the Difference Between Train and Validation and Test?

Train vs Validation

The training set teaches your model. The validation set helps you fine-tune it. You use both before testing. Confusing these two creates biased performance estimates and increases regulatory risk.

Validation vs Test

The validation dataset adjusts the model. The test dataset judges it. QA teams must ensure the test data remains unseen until the final step. This helps ensure objective performance reporting.

📘 If you handle method development or system qualification, mastering this distinction is essential.

When Should You Use Cross-Validation?

Cross-validation helps you make the most of small datasets. Instead of using a single validation set, you divide the training data into folds. Then, each fold gets used as a validation set once.

What Is the Best Train Validation Test Ratio?

There is no one-size-fits-all ratio. However, these are the most commonly used train validation test splits:

Large dataset (10,000+ samples)

➤ 70% train
➤ 15% validation
➤ 15% test

Medium dataset (1,000–10,000 samples)

➤ 60% train
➤ 20% validation
➤ 20% test

Small dataset (<1,000 samples)

➤ 70% train
➤ 30% test (with cross-validation instead of a separate validation set)

Conclusion: What You Must Do Now

Now that you understand the train validation test structure, here are your next steps:

  1. 🔐 Always separate test data from the start
  2. 🧪 Use validation sets only for tuning
  3. 🧠 Adopt cross-validation for small datasets
  4. 📝 Document your data split in your lab records
  5. 📚 Train your team using Pharmuni’s foundational course

Remember, labs that follow proper train validation test procedures build more trustworthy models, pass audits, and protect patient safety.

Want to elevate your knowledge?

Picture of Ershad Moradi

Ershad Moradi

Ershad Moradi, a Content Marketing Specialist at Zamann Pharma Support, brings 6 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry. Specializing in pharmaceutical and medical technologies, Ershad is currently focused on expanding his knowledge in marketing and improving communication in the field. Outside of work, Ershad enjoys reading and attending industry related networks to stay up-to-date on the latest advancements. With a passion for continuous learning and growth, Ershad is always looking for new opportunities to enhance his skills and contribute to pharmaceutical industry. Connect with Ershad on Facebook for more information.

Use the secrets in this blog to ace your upcoming CAPA audit and reduce risk.

CAPA Audit Secrets Quality Experts Won’t Tell You

Want to improve CAPA audit outcomes? Discover the most effective investigation tools used by quality experts. This guide covers 5 Whys, Pareto charts, and more. Get practical tips and start your journey with Pharmuni’s CAPA Management Course. Enroll now for results!

Read More »
A structured train validation test split prevents compliance issues.

Train Validation Test in Lab: What You Must Know

Confused about train validation test roles in lab settings? This guide explains data split strategies, model evaluation, and dataset importance. Understand the difference between test and validation. Boost your skills now—join Pharmuni’s Laboratory Method Validation course and stay GMP compliant.

Read More »

Share